The spesies diversity of arthropods in surjan and conventional farming systems in the Special Region of Yogyakarta
Article Sidebar
Main Article Content
Abstract
An ecosystem is the relationship between insects and the environment in carrying out life processes. The majority of insects are herbivores, and plants serve as their main hosts. Plants also secrete hormone compounds that are favored by arthropods as both a food source and a host for survive. Based on their nature, arthropods are divided into pests and natural enemies. The surjan system is one of the agroecosystem modifications for sustainable agriculture. The study aimed to assess arthropod spesies diversity in different cropping systems. Monitoring was conducted on surjan and conventional land, using several types of traps, including pitfall traps, yellow traps, and pheromone traps. The diversity of arthropods in an ecosystem serves as an indicator of environmental health. This research provides recommendation for managing arthropods, whether as pests or natural enemies. The highest diversity index value was found in the conventional system, with the Shannon_H’ value of of 1.57 for trapping 1, 1.27 for trapping 2, 2.06 for trapping 3, and 1.20 for trapping 4. The species diversity (H’ > 1) value was classified in the medium category. The results of morphological identification revealed two species with the highest abundance: Bactrocera sp. and Atherigona sp. The effectiveness of yellow traps was higher compared to other types of trap, capturing a total of 280 species of pests.
Article Details
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
References
Balbuena D, Inga G, Ponce L, Zuniga R, & Kays R. 2023. Olingos do eat insects: Records of nocturnal mammals preying on arthropods in arboreal live-capture traps. Food Webs. 36: e00298. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fooweb.2023.e00298
Bolliger J, Haller J, Wermelinger B, Blum S, & Obrist MK. 2022. Contrasting effects of street light shapes and LED color temperatures on nocturnal insects and bats. Basic Appl. Ecol. 64: 1–12. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.baae.2022.07.002
Brandmeier J, Reininghaus H, Pappagallo S, Karley AJ, Kiær LP, & Scherber C. 2021. Intercropping in high input agriculture supports arthropod diversity without risking significant yield losses. Basic Appl. Ecol. 53: 26–38. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.baae.2021.02.011
Christensen JW, Strøm CG, Nicová K, de Gaillard CL, Sandøe P, & Skovgård H. 2022. Insect-repelling behaviour in horses in relation to insect prevalence and access to shelters. Appl. Anim. Behav. Sci. 247: 105560. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.applanim.2022.105560
Dutta SK, Laing A, Kumar S, Shambhavi S, Kumar S, Kumar B, Verma DK, Kumar A, Singh RG, & Gathala M. 2023. Sustainability, productivity, profitability and nutritional diversity of six cropping systems under conservation agriculture: A long term study in eastern India. Agric. Syst. 207: 103641. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agsy.2023.103641
Eckert M, Gaigher R, Pryke JS, Janion-Scheepers C, & Samways MJ. 2023. High trait diversity among soil arthropods allows their survival in a heterogeneous eco-agricultural mosaic. Soil Biol. Biochem. 186: 109180. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.soilbio.2023.109180
Ganser D, Knop E, & Albrecht M. 2019. Sown wildflower strips as overwintering habitat for arthropods: Effective measure or ecological trap?. Agric. Ecosyst. Environ. 275: 123–131. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agee.2019.02.010
Gong S, Zhou X, Zhu X, Huo J, Faghihinia M, Li B, & Zou Y. 2023. Organic rice cultivation enhances the diversity of above-ground arthropods but not below-ground soil eukaryotes. Agric. Ecosyst. Environ. 347: 108390. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agee.2023.108390
Habriantono B, Suharto S, Wagiyana W, Hoesain M, Jatmiko MW, Prastowo S, Pradana AP, Nurdika AAH, & Alfarisy FK. 2023. Toxicology of Nuclear Polyhedrosis Virus, botanical and synthetic pesticides on mortality rate of Crocidolomia binotalis (Zeller). Baghdad. Sci. J. 20(1): 17–25. https://doi.org/10.21123/bsj.2022.6154
Hevia V, Carmona CP, Azcárate FM, Heredia R, & González JA. 2021. Role of floral strips and semi-natural habitats as enhancers of wild bee functional diversity in intensive agricultural landscapes. Agric. Ecosyst. Environ . 319: 1–9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agee.2021.107544
Jayanthi PDK & Verghese A. 2011. Host-plant phenology and weather based forecasting models for population prediction of the oriental fruit fly, Bactrocera dorsalis Hendel. Crop Prot. 30(12): 1557–1562. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cropro.2011.09.002
Kim SB & Kim DS. 2018. A tentative evaluation for population establishment of Bactrocera dorsalis (Diptera: Tephritidae) by its population modeling: Considering the temporal distribution of host plants in a selected area in Jeju, Korea. J. Asia. Pac. Entomol. 21(2): 451–465. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aspen.2018.01.022
Kivelä L, Elgert C, Lehtonen TK, & Candolin U. 2023. The color of artificial light affects mate attraction in the common glow-worm. Sci. Total Environ. 857(3): 159451. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2022.159451
Masnilah R, Budi ION, Pradana AP & Alfarisy FK. 2021. Secondary metabolite Ceiba pentandra Gaertn. as biological control to canker disease on dragon fruit. J. Trop. Life Sci. 11(3): 331–337. https://doi.org/10.11594/jtls.11.03.10
Miyazaki H, Otake J, Mitsuno H, Ozaki K, Kanzaki R, Chui-Ting Chieng A, Kah-Wei Hee A, Nishida R, & Ono H. 2018. Functional characterization of olfactory receptors in the Oriental fruit fly Bactrocera dorsalis that respond to plant volatiles. Insect Biochem. Mol. Biol. 101: 32–46. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ibmb.2018.07.002
Mukwevho L, Ndlovu M, Chikowore G, Dalu T, Mutamiswa R, & Chidawanyika F. 2024. Responses of ground-dwelling arthropods to long-term prescribed fire regimes in a savanna-protected area. Rangel. Ecol. Manag. 95: 46–65. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rama.2024.04.008
Murali-Baskaran RK, Mooventhan P, Das D, Dixit A, Sharma KC, Senthil-Nathan S, Kaushal P, & Ghosh PK. 2022. The future of plant volatile organic compounds (pVOCs) research: Advances and applications for sustainable agriculture. Environ. Exp. Bot. 200: 104912. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envexpbot.2022.104912
Norris SL, Blackshaw RP, Dunn RM, Critchley NR, Smith KE, Williams JR, Randall NP, & Murray PJ. 2016. Improving above and below-ground arthropod biodiversity in maize cultivation systems. Appl. Soil. Ecol. 108: 25–46. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apsoil.2016.07.015
Nsengimana V, de Dieu Nsenganeza J, Hagenimana T, & Dekoninck W. 2023. Impact of chemical fertilizers on diversity and abundance of soil-litter arthropod communities in coffee and banana plantations in southern Rwanda. CRSUST. 5: 100215. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.crsust.2023.100215
Peng L, Xu XJ, Liao XF, Liu JM, & Chen JZ. 2023. Ampelocalamus luodianensis (Poaceae), a plant endemic to karst, adapts to resource heterogeneity in differing microhabitats by adjusting its biomass allocation. GECCO. Conserv. 41: e02374. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gecco.2023.e02374
Rijanta R. 2018. Sustainability of the Sawah Surjan agricultural systems in Depok Village, Panjatan Subdistrict, Kulonprogo Regency, Yogyakarta Special Province. Forum Geografi. 32(2): 109–118. https://doi.org/10.23917/forgeo.v32i2.5798
Shin YK, Kim SB, & Kim DS. 2020. Attraction characteristics of insect pests and natural enemies according to the vertical position of yellow sticky traps in a strawberry farm with high-raised bed cultivation. J. Asia. Pac. Entomol. 23(4): 1062–1066. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aspen.2020.08.016
Trisnawati DW, Nurkomar I, Antono A, & Puspitasari E. 2024. Diversity and community structure of predators in surjan (polyculture) and lembaran (monoculture) paddy fields. J. Trop. Plant Pests. Dis. 24(2): 162–172. https://doi.org/10.23960/jhptt.224162-172